The Assassination of Abraham Lincoln


Abraham Lincoln (1809-1865) is one among the well know Presidents of America. So much has been written concerning his life and death. Nevertheless, his murder has been surrounded by so many mysteries that are yet to be known. But the truth is: On April 14, 1865 Abraham Lincoln and his wife went for a play at Ford’s Theatre. General Ulysses Grant and his wife also were to go along with them. But, later their plans changed. Abraham Lincoln and his wife went to the play together with Clara Harris and Henry Rathbone.

In the course of the play, a man by name John Wilkes Booth who was an actor made his way where Lincoln was sitting and shot him. And at the same time Henry Rathbone was stabbed. After the President was shot, Booth ran out of the box and made his way to the stage, as a result of that his left leg broke and he shouted ‘’As always to tyrants’’.

Another of Booth’s link Powell furthermore undertook to murder the secretary of state known as Seward, but did not succeed. David Herold and Powell were together But, Herold took off earlier than the action was over. At the same time, the Vice president was to be killed by a man named George Atzerodt but, he failed to take part in the plot. Booth and Herold took to heels and made their way to Tavern in Maryland where they took goods, and they proceeded to Dr. Samuel’s home, where Booth was treated. Lincoln died shortly after he was taken to the Petersen’s House1. Around the middle of April, Herold and Booth were sighted in a position called Port Royal. Herold surrendered while Booth did not and was hiding beneath a barn that was soon after set ablaze. Following this confusion, Booth ran out of the barn and was shot by a soldier.

A court interrogated some of the eight plotters that were arrested after some few days and were found guilty. And were punished base on their various participations. Powell, Herold, Atzerodt and Mary Surratt were found guilty of uniting with Booth flanking with several other crimes and were executed. Dr. Samuel was found guilty of uniting with Booth and given a life sentence. But, Vice President Johnson at long last pardoned him around 1869. Berlin and Ronald explained how the life imprisonments were as well issued to Arnold and Michael who had combined with Booth to seize Lincoln. O’Laughlen passed on while in jail but Arnold was freed later in 1869.

Edman Spangler was faulted by aiding Booth’s flee from the scene, but was freed in 1869 by President Johnson2. As explained previously, these facts are identified for sure. Nevertheless, who actually got implicated in the murder of Abraham Lincoln? Several theories have come up in trying to explain on how this dreadful calamity could have happened. Subsequently, a small number of these theories will be given in detail below.

Pre-Murder: Kidnap

Was murder the primary objective? The universal agreement this day is that the primary objective of the involved persons was to abduct the President. A little attempt to abduct Lincoln fell in the course, and the north was surrounded by the union. Booth’s feelings turned to assassination. Until lately, however, there was assumption as to the carrying out a seizure scheme. Several folks felt it was used to vindicate the executed instigators. Even the supporters of the judge were afraid to speak of a kidnap scheme would result to a blameless ruling for a few if not all of the plotters.

They are thought to have concealed significant facts like the diary of booth. On the contrary, several folks disputed for the actuality of an abduction scheme because it strengthened their wish to link Booth with a superior plot instigated by the union. With the kidnapping plot recognized, the query remains: Who was really connected and concerned in the Presidents murder.

The Plain Scheme Theory

The plain scheme in its fundamental form explains that Booth and some set of his associates at first intended to abduct the president. This finally led to murder. In fact, the secretary of state and the vice president were supposed to be murdered by the plotters simultaneously. Their aim was to offer the South the opportunity to grow once more. Base on his diary, John Wilkes alleged that President Lincoln was a dictator and Booth has to be applauded like how Brutus was for the murder Caesar. When the two Secretaries of Lincoln wrote his history in 1890, they portrayed the murder as a plain scheme.

The Major Scheme Theory

Even when Lincoln’s private Secretaries portrayed the plain scheme as the most likely situation, they recognized that Booth and his partners had shady connections with union leaders. The Major scheme theory emphasised on these links flanked by Booth and union leaders. Several differences exist of this speculation. For instance, it believed that Booth had links with union leaders in North America3.

It is values noting that President Johnson in 1865 gave a declaration offering a prize for the apprehension of Jefferson Davis in linking with the murder of Lincoln. He was detained as of the proof by a person called Conover who was shortly exposed to have given a dishonest proof. The Republicans also authorized the thought of the Major Scheme to fall by the side for the reason that Lincoln had to be a scapegoat, and would not want his standing tainted with the thought that somebody would desire him murdered except a crazy man.

Eisenschmil’s Major Scheme Theory

This Scheme theory was a new study of Lincoln’s murder as examined by Eisenschiml and narrated in his volume Why Was Lincoln assassinated? It involves the contentious notable administrator of conflict Edwin Stanton. He alleged that the usual account of Lincoln’s murder was insufficient. This unstable assumption is centred on the belief that Grant would not have just made up his mind not to go with the President to the play without an instruction. Eisenschiml thought that Stanton was entangled in Grant’s outcome since he was the only one previous than Lincoln from whom Grant would have taken instructions.

Elkins explained how Eisenschiml proceeds to give hidden reasons for many of the activities Stanton carried out instantly after the murder. He allegedly left one getaway path out of Washington, that same path Booth took. John parker, who was the president’s security, went scot-free for leaving his place of duty4. Eisenschiml in addition explains that the plotters were shielded, murdered or taken to an isolated detention centre so that they could by no means involve anybody. This is precisely the view where Eisenschiml’s theory fails as do most other Major Scheme theories. Numerous of the plotters had sufficient time and chance to talk and involve Stanton and many others if a Major Scheme really existed.

Minor Conspiracies

Many other Lincoln murder scheme theories live. Few of the most exciting, include President Johnson and papacy. Fellows of the legislature attempted to involve Andrew Johnson in the murder. They set up a unique committee to examine in 1867. The board could not locate any connections flanked by vice President Johnson and the assassination. It is motivating to mention that Johnson was impeached by the house that same year. The subsequent assumption as projected by Emmett and others is that Lincoln was despised by the Catholic Church. This is centred on Lincoln’s lawful protection of an ex- Priest in opposition to a Chicago Bishop. This assumption is additional improved by the detail John Surratt, the child of Mary Surratt, left America and stayed in the Vatican. Though, the facts linking Pope Pius IX in the midst of the murder are uncertain at best.


The murder of President Lincoln has passed via several modifications in the last years. Instantly, subsequent to the calamity, the Major Scheme connecting the union leaders was the generally acknowledged. Approximately to transition in the century, the plain Scheme theory had improved a place of distinction. In the 30’s, The Major scheme theory arose with the journal of why President Lincoln was assassinated. Subsequently, the duration has been spread with other bizarre schemes to clarify the murder. As the period has elapsed, one thing is factual, Lincoln has turn out to be and will continue to be an American icon acclaimed with a remarkable power of determination and given glory for saving our country from splitting and ethical oblivion.


Berlin, Ira and Ronald Hoffman, eds. Slavery and Freedom in the Age of the American Revolution University Press of Virginia, 1983. essays by scholars.

Elkins, Stanley. Assassination of Lincoln: Problem in American Institutional and Intellectual Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976. Web.

Kelly, Martin. Abraham Lincoln Assassination Conspiracies: Assassination Facts. 2010. Web.


  1. Kelly, Martin. Abraham Lincoln Assassination Conspiracies: Assassination Facts.
  2. Berlin, Ira and Ronald Hoffman, eds. Slavery and Freedom in the Age of the American Revolution.
  3. Kelly, Martin. Abraham Lincoln Assassination Conspiracies: Assassination Facts.
  4. Elkins, Stanley. Assassination of Lincoln: Problem in American Institutional and Intellectual Life.
Find out the price of your paper